Skip to content

CUSTOM SOLUTIONS / SEAL DESIGN

Seal Design Review for New and Revised Applications

Discuss seal geometry, gland details and material requirements in the context of your application. Start with available drawings, dimensions, samples or a description of the design question.

Request a Technical Review

Engineering Support for Your Seal Project

FLUID can provide O-ring groove dimension design and calculations, tolerance analysis, and engineering drawing creation or revision. We can also develop seals from physical samples and coordinate sample development, dimensional inspection and performance validation to agreed project requirements.

The inputs, deliverables, acceptance criteria and responsibilities are agreed for each project. Calculation reports, editable CAD files, inspection reports and validation results are not automatic deliverables for every order; any requirement to inspect every part must be agreed. The scope also identifies who performs any inspection or testing.

Gland Design & Tolerance Analysis

For a new or revised arrangement, FLUID can design specific O-ring groove dimensions and calculate squeeze, installed stretch and gland fill, with tolerance analysis. Share the seal and mating-part dimensions, available space, operating conditions and constraints. The review checks the dimensional limits governing contact, compression, available volume and extrusion clearance; assumptions and missing inputs need to be identified before dimensions are confirmed for use.

Engineering Drawings & Revisions

FLUID can create or modify engineering drawings to suit customer requirements. Define the intended function, mating interfaces, dimensions to retain and changes to consider. When the mating-part dimensions must remain unchanged, the seal design should be evaluated against the available groove and interface geometry. If the mating parts can be modified, standard-size seals and corresponding groove or interface adjustments may also be considered, subject to confirming the fixed dimensions and obtaining approval for the proposed changes. Agree the drawing scope, file format, revision identification and approval responsibility, including whether editable files are required. Manufacturing to an existing drawing follows the separate requirements below.

Sample-Based Reverse Engineering

FLUID can develop a proposed seal design from a customer's physical sample, using measurements alongside mating-part information and service requirements. Identify whether the sample is unused or service-exposed, its operating history and the features that matter in the assembly.

Aged, worn, swollen or permanently deformed samples may differ from the original part. Sample measurements alone cannot establish the original dimensions, tolerances or compound formulation, or guarantee reproduction of the original service life. The proposed geometry, material requirements and evaluation plan need agreement.

Start with a customer sample, mating-part information and service history, not a sample alone.
Measure the sample and assess wear, ageing and swelling. Its current size is not proof of the original specification.
Propose geometry, material requirements and a drawing revision for review, with agreed assumptions and criteria.
Coordinate samples and inspection; coordinate performance validation under agreed conditions; review results and any changes. Responsibilities are agreed for the project.

Measured sample condition informs a proposed design. It does not prove the original specification or formulation. Qualitative schematics. Not to scale or for manufacturing.

Where does your requirement begin?

A new sealing design

Describe the intended application, available assembly layout and the design questions that need review.

A revised arrangement

Share the existing design and what is changing, such as dimensions, operating conditions or assembly constraints.

An issue with an existing seal

Review the observed issue and service history before assuming a design change is needed. Failure Analysis can help frame the next questions.

What information helps the review?

These details are optional preparation, not prerequisites for contacting us. A request to manufacture an existing drawing can be discussed separately without assuming that the design needs revision.

  • Seal and gland geometry: available seal dimensions, gland details, mating surfaces, clearances, tolerances, drawings or samples.
  • Motion and application: static, reciprocating or rotating conditions, sealed media, temperature, pressure and operating cycles where known.
  • Assembly constraints: installation method, access, available space, mating-component information and any existing material requirements.

From Drawing to Manufacturing Requirements

For parts based on an existing drawing, share its number and revision, specified material or compound, hardness, key dimensions and tolerances, and quantity, where available. If a design change is needed, identify what should change and which requirements must remain unchanged.

Let us know if you have specific tooling, sample, or inspection requirements. Whether these steps are needed, and what they involve, depends on the part and the project requirements. Supply feasibility is reviewed on a project-specific basis.

You do not need a complete specification to begin. Start with the information you have.

Request a Technical Review

What the design review considers

  • Review the relationship between seal geometry, gland details, mating components and installation using the information available.
  • Consider material requirements together with the media, temperature, pressure, motion and assembly constraints rather than in isolation.
  • Identify missing information and any further checks or application-specific validation needed before a revised arrangement is confirmed.

A drawing or dimension alone does not confirm a final sealing arrangement. Technical direction depends on review of the available application information.

O-Ring Design: How the Main Factors Work Together

An O-ring works as part of an assembly. Cross-section, installed fit, gland dimensions and mating surfaces must be considered with the operating conditions. Material selection cannot compensate for every geometry or assembly problem.

These principles address conventional solid elastomer O-rings. PTFE, encapsulated and other special constructions require their own guidance; compound requirements can also change the approach. Project calculations need defined inputs and assumptions rather than a universal set of groove dimensions.

Start with the Sealing Arrangement

Static and dynamic describe relative movement at the sealing interface. Radial and axial describe the direction of cross-section compression. A radial seal can therefore be static or dynamic.

Radial arrangements require the groove location, mating diameters and clearances for the piston/bore or rod/housing assembly. Axial or face arrangements require the groove and opposing face geometry. Internal or external pressure affects ring diameter selection and the groove wall supporting the ring; flatness, parallelism and joint opening under load affect the sealing space.

The groove is the recess in a component; the gland is the complete space formed with the opposing component. Groove depth is not always the assembled gland height. Retaining grooves, crush seals and floating pneumatic arrangements need separate treatment.

Piston-groove local section. The installed O-ring has flat contact bands at the bore and groove floor; radial compression is perpendicular to the dashed assembly-axis direction. The qualitative shape does not specify squeeze.
Housing-groove local section. The installed O-ring has flat contact bands at the housing groove floor and rod surface. Radial compression is perpendicular to the assembly axis; the groove is not in the rod.
Face-seal local section. The O-ring has flat contact bands on the groove floor and opposing face. Compression is parallel to the dashed assembly axis; the qualitative deformation is not a specified squeeze amount.

Radial / axial describes compression direction. Static / dynamic describes relative motion; it is a separate classification. Qualitative installed shapes and direction arrows only; no squeeze amount is specified. Not to scale or for manufacturing.

Squeeze, Installed Stretch and Gland Fill

FactorWhat it describesWhy it matters
SqueezeReduction in cross-section along the direction of compressionCreates initial contact; excessive squeeze increases assembly load and can increase dynamic friction and wear
Installed stretchIncrease in inside diameter from the free, unstretched state to the seated condition, expressed relative to the free-state inside diameterCan reduce the effective cross-section and change squeeze
Gland fillSeal volume as a proportion of available gland volumeIndicates space remaining for dimensional variation and volume change

The free-state inside diameter is measured on an uninstalled, unstretched ring under defined measurement conditions. It is not the shaft, rod or groove diameter. For a ring seated in tension, installed stretch compares its seated inside diameter with its free-state inside diameter. Temporary stretching to pass over a component during assembly is a separate check. Piston, rod and face seals have different fit requirements; outside-diameter interference must not be treated as the same condition as inside-diameter stretch.

Squeeze is deformation, not compression force. Force also depends on compound, hardness and ring dimensions. Compression set describes residual deformation after release under specified test conditions; it is not a direct measure of squeeze or service life.

Gland fill and squeeze need separate checks. Widening a groove does not establish squeeze, and adding back-up rings changes the available space. Allowance for thermal expansion and media-induced swelling must be considered with dimensional limits.

Free O-ring cross-section d zero and assembled section with gland height h. Installed fit can change effective cross-section before squeeze. The two shapes are qualitative, not a deformation simulation.
Radial piston local section. Gland height h extends from bore surface to groove floor. Groove depth t extends from piston land to groove floor. The local mating gap makes h larger than t in this schematic.
A single leader identifies remaining gland space outside the O-ring section. Gland fill compares seal volume with available gland volume, not simply the area of this local section; back-up rings occupy space.

Free-state dimensions, fitted geometry and available gland volume need separate checks. Qualitative schematics. Not to scale or for manufacturing.

Check Tolerance Extremes, Not Only Nominal Dimensions

A nominal fit can conceal insufficient squeeze at one combination of limits and excessive compression at another. The calculation needs seal tolerances, effective cross-section after installed stretch and the mating-component dimensions defining the assembled gland.

Check minimum squeeze/contact, maximum compression, maximum gland fill and maximum local extrusion clearance separately. Different combinations of tolerance limits may govern each result. Alignment, joint closure and deformation under load can also change the effective geometry. A sample measurement is evidence of its present condition, not proof of the original tolerance limits.

Separate checks for minimum squeeze, maximum squeeze, maximum gland fill and maximum local extrusion gap. Different tolerance combinations may govern. This is a qualitative checklist, not a tolerance calculation.

Separate limit checks; no nominal fit or single tolerance combination establishes every result. Qualitative schematics. Not to scale or for manufacturing.

Pressure, Extrusion Clearance and Back-up Rings

Pressure loads the ring against sealing surfaces but also drives elastomer toward a lower-pressure clearance, where extrusion and cycling damage may occur. Assess differential pressure, peaks, direction and reversals together with compound, hardness, cross-section and temperature.

Distinguish a one-sided radial gap from the difference between mating diameters. Eccentricity, side loading, expansion and wear can increase the largest local opening; nominal concentric clearance alone may be misleading.

A back-up ring supports the elastomer at the extrusion gap and is not normally the primary seal. One-direction pressure calls for support on the lower-pressure side; reversing pressure requires consideration of both sides. Construction, material, installation access and additional groove width must suit the assembly. Adding support or hardness alone does not establish a pressure rating.

One-direction pressure acts from left to right. A blue back-up ring is on the lower-pressure right side of the red O-ring, supporting the extrusion gap. The bracket g marks only the local one-sided radial gap between the bore and piston land.
End view of concentric mating diameters D and d. One-sided radial gap g is half the diametral clearance only for this ideal concentric geometry. Eccentricity and deformation require a separate maximum local gap check.

Pressure direction, local gap and space taken by back-up rings require an assembly-specific review. Qualitative schematics. Not to scale or for manufacturing.

Motion, Friction and Lubrication

For reciprocating motion, provide stroke, speed, frequency, reversals, dwell periods and lubrication conditions. Breakaway and running friction differ. Uneven friction, misalignment and ring instability can contribute to twisting or spiral damage. Movement across ports also needs review.

Rotation and oscillation require separate assessment. Continuous rotation can generate local frictional heat. An elastomer O-ring stretched around a shaft can contract as it heats, increasing shaft contact pressure and friction and potentially accelerating heat build-up and wear. Do not transfer a reciprocating fit rule to a rotating shaft. Shaft speed, runout, lubrication and heat dissipation need review; an O-ring may not be the appropriate seal type.

Lubrication must suit the compound, media, mating components and application. Assembly lubricant alone does not establish adequate service lubrication.

Media, Temperature and Changes in Volume

Fluid exposure can cause swelling, shrinkage, softening or hardening, affecting contact, friction, extrusion resistance and gland space. Identify the actual fluid or gas, concentrations, mixtures, additives, cleaners, exposure time and temperature. Compatibility guidance screens candidates; it does not confirm every compound and application.

Elastomer and housing expansion can differ, changing squeeze, clearance and fill. Cold conditions affect elastic recovery; heat can alter stiffness and accelerate permanent changes. Friction can raise interface temperature above fluid temperature. Include minimum and maximum temperatures, continuous and short-term exposure, cold starts and thermal cycling. A material temperature range is not the operating range of the complete assembly.

Surface Quality and Assembly Access

Roughness alone does not describe scratches, machining direction, waviness or local defects. Dynamic surfaces and groove walls have different roles; a finer finish is not automatically better where lubrication retention matters. Identify the surface, measurement parameter and units on the drawing. Housing finish and seal surface acceptance are separate requirements.

Review lead-ins, radii, burrs, threads, keyways, ports and the installation path, together with cleanliness, compatible lubrication and fitting aids. A ring that fits when seated may still be damaged during assembly. Solid back-up rings also need installation access.

Connecting Design Requirements with a Supply Request

Distinguish supply to an approved drawing from a proposed design change. Clarify units, applicable specifications, mating-part information, critical dimensions and surfaces, quantity and acceptance requirements. Material, hardness or tolerance changes can affect fit, tooling and inspection even if the part number stays the same.

Agree any proposed change before treating it as the supply specification. Dimensional conformity alone does not demonstrate sealing performance.

When an Existing Seal Shows a Problem

Observed damage helps frame the next questions. Similar appearances can have different causes, so a photograph alone should not be treated as a confirmed diagnosis.

ObservationQuestions worth checking
Leakage at assembly or startupIs the ring correctly seated? Are squeeze, joint closure, surface condition and installation damage understood?
Leakage after a temperature changeHas elastic recovery changed? Could thermal contraction, prior compression set or differential expansion affect contact?
Material loss at an edgeWhere is the pressure acting? Are local clearance, pressure peaks, movement across ports and extrusion support understood?
A worn or polished contact bandWhat are the motion, lubrication, surface finish, contamination and alignment conditions?
Swelling, shrinkage, hardening or crackingWhich fluids, cleaners, temperatures and exposure times were involved? Is the actual compound known?
Cuts, twist marks or spiral damageCould installation edges, rolling, uneven friction or instability have contributed?

Useful evidence includes the original drawing, photographs showing orientation, the location of damage, service duration, operating history and any recent change. Failure Analysis can help organize the review before a material or geometry change is selected.

From Design to Samples / Inspection / Evaluation

FLUID can coordinate sample development, dimensional inspection and performance validation according to project requirements. Agree what each stage is intended to establish before starting: a dimensional comparison, assembly fit, material evidence or sealing performance under defined conditions.

For samples, identify the proposed drawing revision, material requirements, quantity and approval purpose. For dimensional inspection, agree the features, methods, sampling scope, acceptance limits and required records. For performance validation, define pressure and leakage criteria, media, temperature, motion, cycles and assembly conditions, together with who conducts the work and supplies the evidence.

Deliverables and responsibilities, including any calculation report, drawing files, inspection report or validation results, are agreed for the project. Inspection and testing arrangements do not imply a FLUID-operated laboratory. Changes following evaluation need review before the revised supply specification is confirmed.

Dimensional conformity, material test data and sealing performance answer different questions. A sample result applies to the conditions evaluated; it does not automatically establish service life or performance in other conditions.

Continue the review

Begin with the information you have.

Send a drawing, sample, dimensions, photo, part number, or an application issue.

Request a Technical Review

WhatsApp